Matrix
- chrisdermo
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 1:52 pm
I'm actually using my proto at the moment, but really just as a stereo mixer with 2 aux sends. I'm always tempted by matrix ideas, but never gel with them in practice.
Edit - realised I never put up a pic of the last proto, so here it is..
Kind of silly that I can design and build a whole prototype like this and then shelve it all - but I do learn along the way. Nice specs - balanced I/O, phase switches, quality components etc. But I would rather have more input channels, lose one output and turn the lower two into a L/R pair with pan controls.

Edit - realised I never put up a pic of the last proto, so here it is..
Kind of silly that I can design and build a whole prototype like this and then shelve it all - but I do learn along the way. Nice specs - balanced I/O, phase switches, quality components etc. But I would rather have more input channels, lose one output and turn the lower two into a L/R pair with pan controls.

- chrisdermo
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 1:52 pm
- otoskope
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:04 am
- Location: Island X, West Coast of Sweden
I could chime in, since I am a matrix junkie and I have the other prototype of this green wonder.
There is something special with a pure matrix, allowing any routing combination, not presupposing anything about how it should be used. That is great for feedback experiments, additive CV stuff, complex fx routing etc.
On the other hand, what you now describe, Tom, is more like a master mixer for the modular. It would indeed be convenient, but less a matrix. There are also matrix mixers centered around the LRpan paradigm, on all channels, of course.
I use mine mostly for fx routing in my analog fx modular (all bugs). But I have also used it as a master mixer for the modular a few times.
I have to agree that I work more and more with stero synthesis and processing, and then five is far to few, and mono sends wouldn't cut it either.
Where's that 8x8 matrix monster you were working on a few years ago, Tom? I would love such a thing.
Oh, and Allen & Heath's excellent matrix mixer, the Wizard 12m, has selectable mono or LRpan configurations for all channels - using the same knobs. I guess that complicates matters quite a bit. But it is very practical.
In your green matrix, Tom, I appreciate the input and output levels. Phase is not so crucial to me (except for CV, but I think it is AC coupled, isn't it?). It matters in some feedback configurations, of course.
I have said it before, and I say it again - I think you should start making this, Tom, in one form or another - also as a desktop unit, it would greatly help the "noise devices on a table" crowd, and they are quite a few. As well as make modularists happy!
There is something special with a pure matrix, allowing any routing combination, not presupposing anything about how it should be used. That is great for feedback experiments, additive CV stuff, complex fx routing etc.
On the other hand, what you now describe, Tom, is more like a master mixer for the modular. It would indeed be convenient, but less a matrix. There are also matrix mixers centered around the LRpan paradigm, on all channels, of course.
I use mine mostly for fx routing in my analog fx modular (all bugs). But I have also used it as a master mixer for the modular a few times.
I have to agree that I work more and more with stero synthesis and processing, and then five is far to few, and mono sends wouldn't cut it either.
Where's that 8x8 matrix monster you were working on a few years ago, Tom? I would love such a thing.
Oh, and Allen & Heath's excellent matrix mixer, the Wizard 12m, has selectable mono or LRpan configurations for all channels - using the same knobs. I guess that complicates matters quite a bit. But it is very practical.
In your green matrix, Tom, I appreciate the input and output levels. Phase is not so crucial to me (except for CV, but I think it is AC coupled, isn't it?). It matters in some feedback configurations, of course.
I have said it before, and I say it again - I think you should start making this, Tom, in one form or another - also as a desktop unit, it would greatly help the "noise devices on a table" crowd, and they are quite a few. As well as make modularists happy!
- indexofmetals
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:49 am
- Location: Isle of Man
-
- Common Wiggler
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:43 am
- Location: mother earth
I'm also interested in a matrix mixer, because I gave up my old console (it was too big for my actual room) and I find it aways interesting...on the net I found this ones, extremely pricy probably because they're built with mic preamp and eq inside...
http://www.ex-o.co.jp/mat-55.htm
otherwise who produces matrix mixers nowadays??? they're quite rare as standalone because they're normally embedded in mixing consoles...or am I missing something?
http://www.ex-o.co.jp/mat-55.htm
otherwise who produces matrix mixers nowadays??? they're quite rare as standalone because they're normally embedded in mixing consoles...or am I missing something?
-
- Veteran Wiggler
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:38 am
tom, are you still thinking about this?
i'd be in for a 8x8 (maybe standalone?) matrix mixer with both bananas and 1/4 jack inputs and outputs (is this even possible?). this would let me mix and match between modular ins/outs, and other gear coming in and out. this would mean 4 stereo ins with 4 stereo auxes (or 8 dual mono...)
also, could anyone explain exactly how you use your matrix mixers? or a bird's eye view of why they are so useful?
from this link: https://www.talkbass.com/threads/the-4x ... is.990222/ i kindof understand but not entirely...
i'd be in for a 8x8 (maybe standalone?) matrix mixer with both bananas and 1/4 jack inputs and outputs (is this even possible?). this would let me mix and match between modular ins/outs, and other gear coming in and out. this would mean 4 stereo ins with 4 stereo auxes (or 8 dual mono...)
also, could anyone explain exactly how you use your matrix mixers? or a bird's eye view of why they are so useful?
from this link: https://www.talkbass.com/threads/the-4x ... is.990222/ i kindof understand but not entirely...
I still have a love-hate relationship with matrix ideas.
Latest proposal is to keep it banana/modular - ie. not add the complexity of 1/4" / preamps etc.
I still personally live with an external 'proper' mixer next to my setups, so this design is much more focused on mixing within a modular setup.
Pure DC coupled with polarity switching / muting for each control - 6 in, 4 out::: (picture a little rough around the edges - labels / details etc)

Latest proposal is to keep it banana/modular - ie. not add the complexity of 1/4" / preamps etc.
I still personally live with an external 'proper' mixer next to my setups, so this design is much more focused on mixing within a modular setup.
Pure DC coupled with polarity switching / muting for each control - 6 in, 4 out::: (picture a little rough around the edges - labels / details etc)

-
- Veteran Wiggler
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:38 am
- chrisdermo
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 1:52 pm
Love this idea. Biggest thing for me with the old one was needing mutes per pot rather than per input. Perfect!
One of these with a couple of dual preamps, some processing modules and an output mixer could easily satisfy those that want to process non-bugs audio.
Personally I’d only want to matrix mix within the modular as well so this is great!
One of these with a couple of dual preamps, some processing modules and an output mixer could easily satisfy those that want to process non-bugs audio.
Personally I’d only want to matrix mix within the modular as well so this is great!
WTB / WTTF: Bugbrand PRC2B, ENV1
Current Bugs frame:
https://www.modulargrid.net/f/racks/view/1340165
Current Bugs frame:
https://www.modulargrid.net/f/racks/view/1340165
-
- Veteran Wiggler
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:38 am
- chrisdermo
- Super Deluxe Wiggler
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 1:52 pm
Any module that can be used to process / transform another soundodditymedium wrote:chris, which are the processing modules?

Filters, LPGs, Ring Mods, Bugcrushers, VCAs, Wavefolders, Oscillator FM, Crossover Filter, PT Delay, Spring Tanker etc etc
WTB / WTTF: Bugbrand PRC2B, ENV1
Current Bugs frame:
https://www.modulargrid.net/f/racks/view/1340165
Current Bugs frame:
https://www.modulargrid.net/f/racks/view/1340165
This is some kind of serious matrix mixer you have hereBugBrand wrote:...more focused on mixing within a modular setup.
Pure DC coupled with polarity switching / muting for each control - 6 in, 4 out:::

I do not use my old blue matrix mixer because of the difficulty to get the 0 point on the pot in the middle, but on this new layout, with these switches for polarity and mute for each pot, it looks IMHO like the best solution for a powerful module.
6 inputs each is a lot

Maybe you need the ability to mute the main outs too

not for me really, as I would prefer to use a standalone mixer for end of the signal path and i need more modulation sources to begin with... but chiming in to say it looks great and I still want one! 

A Dingleberry Monstrosity wrote:CATS OR GTFO!!!!!
www.shredderghost.bandcamp.com
Yeah, I hope to move forwards with it sometime soon. I do think it would be a useful block for bigger systems.
Quadraphonic - it is four channel, but I never really looked in to such usages.
6 input channels - I always think you need a couple for routing returns - four is never quite enough.
Mutes - I know - it is a lot of switches, but I think it is the natural way.
Quadraphonic - it is four channel, but I never really looked in to such usages.
6 input channels - I always think you need a couple for routing returns - four is never quite enough.
Mutes - I know - it is a lot of switches, but I think it is the natural way.