Video Capture Devices
Video Capture Devices
i've found a few random threads that briefly talk about video capture devices... but not much of a dedicated thread.
please share info about your capture tools:
- what hardware
- what software
- and what line rate (480, 720, 1080) are you ending up with?
right now i'm using a stupid Dazzel and ending up with silly 640x480.
tried using the ADVC 55 but was getting intermittent digital lego-land glitching and sent it back. considering picking up what Lars is using - Matrox MXO2 Mini w/composite to component/RGsB converter .... but would really like to find something that is standalone so i won't need a computer everywhere.
please share info about your capture tools:
- what hardware
- what software
- and what line rate (480, 720, 1080) are you ending up with?
right now i'm using a stupid Dazzel and ending up with silly 640x480.
tried using the ADVC 55 but was getting intermittent digital lego-land glitching and sent it back. considering picking up what Lars is using - Matrox MXO2 Mini w/composite to component/RGsB converter .... but would really like to find something that is standalone so i won't need a computer everywhere.
Any standalone hard-drive based devices are going to be low quality or extremely expensive I think. I'd be interested what people are using for that too, though! snufkin, weren't you using a very small portable thing for this? I have a Sony DVD recorder that's very small and portable, but the video quality is crap compared to what I get out of my capture hardware.
LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net
- wcfields
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 9:59 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
Output from computer:- what hardware
Code: Select all
Adobe Premiere CS 5.5 Timeline (Playback to 2nd Monitor) -> VGA -> Extron Super Emotia GX Scan Converter -> Analog LandCode: Select all
S-Video from Analog Land -> Canopus AVDC100 -> Firewire 400/800 Cable -> DV Capture in Adobe Premiere CS 5.5I used to use Final Cut 7 a lot, but switched to Adobe Premiere a while ago. I find with capturing DV footage from the Canpous or even from a DVCAM deck it produces much fewer dropped frames.- what software
Typically I'll burn the footage to a DVD at the TV station (but DVDs suck for rapid movement and get super pixelated, for those I'll take a capture from the DVCAM tape). In those cases I'll use MPEGStreamclip to rip the DVD.
480i, then de-interlace in Premiere before encoding to 640x480 for web.- and what line rate (480, 720, 1080) are you ending up with?
Almost all my gear (except for the video cameras) is NTSC/PAL switchable. I've been considering experimenting with using PAL for the extra few lines of resolution.
Experimental Half Hour - LA's own television show of experimental music and performance art.Briz, there's a diagram of my studio connections here if you are curious. I am running a similar setup to wcfields.
viewtopic.php?t=51895
edit: the main difference between my setup and wcfields is the Matrox MXO2 can natively upscale and capture in HD resolutions, like 1080i/p and 720 i/p. while you don't increase the "resolution" that much, this looks WAY nicer than if you took a 480i image and stretched it to 1080i resolutions in software.
viewtopic.php?t=51895
edit: the main difference between my setup and wcfields is the Matrox MXO2 can natively upscale and capture in HD resolutions, like 1080i/p and 720 i/p. while you don't increase the "resolution" that much, this looks WAY nicer than if you took a 480i image and stretched it to 1080i resolutions in software.
LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net
- wcfields
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 9:59 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
Also NTSC DV Capture colorspace is limited to 4:1:1 while the Matrox MXO2 can do up to 4:2:2.creatorlars wrote:Briz, there's a diagram of my studio connections here if you are curious. I am running a similar setup to wcfields.
viewtopic.php?t=51895
edit: the main difference between my setup and wcfields is the Matrox MXO2 can natively upscale and capture in HD resolutions, like 1080i/p and 720 i/p. while you don't increase the "resolution" that much, this looks WAY nicer than if you took a 480i image and stretched it to 1080i resolutions in software.
Read more here on colorspace: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chroma_sub ... and_ratios
Edit: PAL DV Colorspace is 4:2:0 which, seems to look better than the NTSC

Experimental Half Hour - LA's own television show of experimental music and performance art.I use a tiny pinnacle stand alone video to MP4 on usb capture devicecreatorlars wrote:Any standalone hard-drive based devices are going to be low quality or extremely expensive I think. I'd be interested what people are using for that too, though! snufkin, weren't you using a very small portable thing for this? I have a Sony DVD recorder that's very small and portable, but the video quality is crap compared to what I get out of my capture hardware.
it was £40 used
it's low quality and I am definatly looking to invest in something new after I get a new laptop for video editing but it's great for gigs,
when I use to vj I would just tape it to another piece of gear and hit record and get the whole nights live tweaking to mess with the next day

here is a good example that shows the artifacting it produces not good but tolerable until I can afford better, the spinning box shows up the lines quite well
[video][/video]
WTB: any Digisound80 / Digisound 80 faceplates/pcbs/kits.
-
xart
- nickciontea
- brownshoesonly
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:37 am
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
I use an Elgato EyeTV Hybrid. Not high quality, but I get some good stuff out of it. I'd love to get something nicer, but this'll do for now. (The MXO2 won't work with my iMac
)
Part of me really wants to go the DV/VHS route and take the computer out of the equation until later on. My computer is aging and it may be better suited for editing after the fact than capturing. I've definitely got some unwanted stuttering when I least expected it. :(
Part of me really wants to go the DV/VHS route and take the computer out of the equation until later on. My computer is aging and it may be better suited for editing after the fact than capturing. I've definitely got some unwanted stuttering when I least expected it. :(
darenager wrote:I wonder how many people with Maths don't know it can file a tax return, or that Plague Bearer can indeed give bears the plague
suitandtieguy wrote:STG IS ALL ABOUT THE PLUR.
that stand alone little Avid Pinnacle Video Transfer is a cool and handy little unit.
wcfields - thanks for the tip on chroma subsampling - looks to be vital if you want to "up convert" the quality. the Blackmagic also does 4:2:2 sampling .... but all the system compatibility requirements are intimidating on the Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle. looks like the Matrox MXO2 is the way to go... then hell - i'll have to buy Adobe Premiere also????
AJA - nice!.... 2K.... ouch.
thanks much for all the input.
wcfields - thanks for the tip on chroma subsampling - looks to be vital if you want to "up convert" the quality. the Blackmagic also does 4:2:2 sampling .... but all the system compatibility requirements are intimidating on the Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle. looks like the Matrox MXO2 is the way to go... then hell - i'll have to buy Adobe Premiere also????
AJA - nice!.... 2K.... ouch.
thanks much for all the input.
It depends a lot on what it's being used for. 4:1:1 is not that bad. The detail of most video signals is in the luminance portion, which is the same for all of those formats. And compared to something like VHS or S-VHS, DV is miles ahead.
At first TV stations wouldn't use DV, or would turn it black & white before using it. But it then became standard fare to broadcast it, and eventually 4:1:1 was the most common field recording method for broadcasters before HD took over.
And there's something not right about that lower row of images, which I'm assuming is one of the color channels. A lot of that looks more like compression artifacts than chroma subsampling artifacts.
At first TV stations wouldn't use DV, or would turn it black & white before using it. But it then became standard fare to broadcast it, and eventually 4:1:1 was the most common field recording method for broadcasters before HD took over.
And there's something not right about that lower row of images, which I'm assuming is one of the color channels. A lot of that looks more like compression artifacts than chroma subsampling artifacts.
-
xart
I do a bit of that every day. Last night I brought the latest revision of my VideOscillator to life. I'm hoping next week I'll have a chance to plug it into a Rutt-Etra and see how it looks.xart wrote:Thanks Dave! (Now get back to working on your new modules!)daverj wrote:The one I use is a fairly early DV camcorder. The Sony DCR-TRV9
- wcfields
- Wiggling with Experience
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 9:59 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California
Does anyone use VJ software (Modul8, VDMX) or MaxMSP / PureData with their analog gear?
How do you interface? Do you setup MIDI Control (Like much of the newer Roland/Edirol has), Control Voltages from a multi-track recorder, or and video I/O?
How do you interface? Do you setup MIDI Control (Like much of the newer Roland/Edirol has), Control Voltages from a multi-track recorder, or and video I/O?
Experimental Half Hour - LA's own television show of experimental music and performance art.I use Resolume, but haven't tried the new version. It's very easy to assign multiple channels separately to Red, Green and Blue and then add them together to the output image. With full color RGB going into the video synth, I can then access all three channels separately as monochrome images within the patch.
I've mapped out Resolume to my DIY midi sequencer (Midibox SEQ4) for live control, but haven't tried any CV conversion back/forth yet.
I've used Ableton and Silent Way to send CV's out on a timeline, and Ableton also allows video embedding/playback on its timeline too. Not exactly VJ software, but pretty handy if you don't need to do much video manipulation in the computer but want source footage and CV modulation sync'ed up with an audio track.
I've mapped out Resolume to my DIY midi sequencer (Midibox SEQ4) for live control, but haven't tried any CV conversion back/forth yet.
I've used Ableton and Silent Way to send CV's out on a timeline, and Ableton also allows video embedding/playback on its timeline too. Not exactly VJ software, but pretty handy if you don't need to do much video manipulation in the computer but want source footage and CV modulation sync'ed up with an audio track.
LZX Industries | http://www.lzxindustries.net
I've been testing resolume, and I love it so far, although it makes my aging laptop full of sadness. When I get a new computer, I plan on keeping the first for audio and midi, then send the midi to the new one running resolume. Just waiting for the wife to get accepted into graduate school so I can get a sweet educational discount. I use both silentway and a midi to cv converter. And a genloc scan converter to get the image into the lzx. Love the flow, just need a faster rig. Vj stuff is great for transformations and mixing live before hitting the lzx for further processing. I bought an older livid controller to use exclusively with the Vj software. Best of both worlds.
I have been using an old DPS Perception PVR for capture. It is finicky, very specific motherboard chipset, captures as a series of JPG images at 720x480 4:2:2 to SCSI drives on it's own controller. Image quality is great, but it it quite cumbersome. I've sort of retired it now and have fallen back to a AVC55 card or something like that..PCI DV analog capture. But I don't like DV. I much prefer 4:2:2 or better.
I've had my eye on an old Decklink card for ages, one of these days I'll finally pick one up.
I've had my eye on an old Decklink card for ages, one of these days I'll finally pick one up.
- nickciontea
- brownshoesonly
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:37 am
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:

