Pigments

Reaktor, MAX/MSP, VST/AU, etc. A place for all things soft....

Moderators: Kent, luketeaford, Joe.

User avatar
j_dowe
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: blono, il

Pigments

Post by j_dowe » Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:09 pm

[update Jan 4: changed subject to just "Pigments," to discuss the merits of the software in general, and not just the "sound quality"]

Looking for opinions on the sound quality of Pigments (new Arturia software synth). It looks really nicely designed, but I'm curious how good the analog modeling is... from the initial demo, it still seems pretty digital/in-the-box sounding, but I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise.

To date, the most convincing analog synth emulation seems to be Softube's Modular (in my limited experience and opinion).
Last edited by j_dowe on Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
orangehexagon
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 5:30 pm
Location: CHICAGO

Post by orangehexagon » Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:30 pm

Arturia makes really great software. I have their V Collection and in a mix I don't think anyone could spot the real thing vs. the software.

I would expect only the same quality from Pigment, but to me, the appeal of Pigment is not emulating synths from the past, but exploring new sounds. Seems like the wavetables and modulation are powerful. I have yet to give it a try, but I'll circle back when I do.

I personally wasn't a fan of Softube Module. There was something about it that I can't put my finger on.

For a hardware alternative, the Novation Peak does an amazing job emulating vintage analog with the diverge and slop parameters. I've made a number of very convincing Prophet 5 sounds.

User avatar
Slic
Common Wiggler
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:19 pm
Location: UK

Post by Slic » Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:02 am

You can try the full working software free for a month so try it and see what your ears tell you.

I bought it for 69 USD (upgrade from v6) and for me it is synth of the year. People are almost universally saying it has one of the best GUIs for programming and feedback, sound is more subjective, but this is a full 6 osc VA and or Wavetable with 8 VA Arturia filters like the SEM.

It has a lot of more east coast modulation (random probability, Turin etc) and a powerful polyrhythmic sequencer. Play the sequence presets and you will find some very modular like sequences.

Looking at the layout of the synth it seems likely that they will be adding to the VA and Wavetable oscillator types, Arturia have a lot of instruments to pluck these things from....I expect FM, Granular etc as they all exist already in in V6.

User avatar
grillo
Veteran Wiggler
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:40 pm
Location: Milan

Post by grillo » Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:12 am

Slic wrote: People are almost universally saying it has one of the best GUIs for programming and feedback, sound is more subjective, but this is a full 6 osc VA and or Wavetable with 8 VA Arturia filters like the SEM.
This sounds really appealing to me. I honestly could never get into some of the arturia emulations because their guis are such a drag to work with, like the minimoog is fine, but the jupiter or the cs80 remade with almost the same front panel proportions of the hardware feel super fiddly.

If they can somehow package some or all of their emulation algos in a clean interface with a modern way of assigning modulation and all the extras like effects and sequencers then it's a winner.

The raw sounds from the demos sound fine to me.

User avatar
mt3
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2882
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:18 pm
Location: vancity
Contact:

Post by mt3 » Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:27 am

[video][/video]

[video][/video]

orbita
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:00 am
Location: London

Post by orbita » Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:12 am

The sound examples and a lot of the presets are very modern and edgy and put me off initially. I've downloaded the demo - which is actually a full featured version including saving until 10 Jan and out of the many soft synths I've had was the first that really found inviting for sound design (although that may in part be that my modular journey has taught me so much).

I was curious how analog it could sound and spend some time comparing the raw saw tooth bass sounds with my Behinger Model D. The raw waveform is pretty good - at least as good as the better virtual analog out there. I've not yet found a Virtual Analog that has quite that same low end roundness or top end fizz as real analog. Pulsar Modular is probably the best I've heard in software in that respect.
That said, I found the adjustable shaped envelopes really useful to help sculpt the sound which is often missing elsewhere and the visual modulation sources great for keeping things interesting. And there are plenty of filters to choose from including the SEM filter which I often use on other synths/samples. The combinator is a neat addition to the modulation. There is no dedicated FM on the OSC but you can apply via modulation.
At $69 upgrade from V6 I will definitely get it. I can imagine it becoming my go to software synth for designing my own sounds given the interface, sound and features.

Panason
is banned
is banned
Posts: 3324
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:56 am

Re: Pigments sound quality

Post by Panason » Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:16 am

j_dowe wrote: from the initial demo, it still seems pretty digital/in-the-box sounding, but I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise.
the subjectivity of hearing is a thing... and so is the internet echo chamber.... why would you want to be persuaded? :despair:

You can't really judge a synth's sound until you've put it in a mix... auditioning synths solo is often deceptive and misleading.

User avatar
j_dowe
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: blono, il

Re: Pigments sound quality

Post by j_dowe » Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:16 pm

Panason wrote:why would you want to be persuaded? :despair:
I didn't say I wanted to be persuaded. I said "I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise"...

I was trying to express that while I've made some judgment, my mind is still open. With so many tools, I find it useful to get other perspectives, as my cursory look/listen may not be sufficient to fully grasp all the pros/cons of a piece of gear or software.

User avatar
computer controlled
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 3886
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 4:16 pm
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by computer controlled » Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:18 pm

I bought it yesterday at the $69 upgrade price, no brainer! So far, it sounds wonderful. The modulation options are second to none, and the Wavetables sound really good. One thing i've found that it excels at is hard, edgy basses especially good for EBM sequences. The Arp and Sequencer is a nice addition and are easy to use. And all the effects! This will def be one of my most used synths for a long time.
Stuff: TR-8S . MX-1 . Waldorf MicroQ . Ensoniq ESQ-1 . Ensoniq EPS 16+ . Ensoniq VFX-SD . Yamaha MODX6 . DX7 . TX802 . SPX900 . MPC Live . RE-303 . Behringer Neutron . Behringer MS-101 . Behringer Pro-1 . Behringer K-2 . Behringer TD-3 . E-mu Emax II . E-mu EMAX II rack . PCM 41 . BeatStep Pro . Keystep .

User avatar
starthief
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 5286
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:39 am
Location: St Louis, MO
Contact:

Post by starthief » Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:32 am

I feel like it should be something I would love immensely, just for having linear and exponential FM, phase modulation, and then both phase distortion and wavefolding with audio rate modulation possible, and all the flexible routing and nice GUI. And wavetable-based; I used to love Serum before I went E352 and then E370.

But I feel like the sound isn't always there. This is the first time in 15+ years of using VST plugins that I want to call a synth "cold and sterile." Don't get me wrong, it's got some sweet spots that really sparkle or growl and sound great. But it makes me wonder why basic FM doesn't sound as alive as it does in Aalto, Buchla Easel V, Cadmium, my Eurorack gear etc.

There are also a few restrictions that are very VST-like and break the potential for more West Coast or modular-like use. The output VCA has an envelope permanently routed to it, and the only thing that can gate that envelope is MIDI -- even though there's a place in the GUI specifically to allow reassigning the gate, and it's enabled in the other envelopes. :bang: The Turing Machine and Binary random modules are forced to use a clock, instead of an arbitrary trigger like the S&H. Stuff like that.

I'll probably pick it up, even though I'm really not using a lot of softsynths anymore, and it'll either be one of those synths that gets used once every 10 songs or so, or else 6 months will pass and I'll realize I've never really used it.

User avatar
alexander92
Common Wiggler
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 5:37 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by alexander92 » Sun Dec 16, 2018 5:56 pm

I tried the demo, but the GUI just puts me off, all those vibrant colors. Also found it quite cluttered, couldn't find my way around with tons of modulation options. Shortly after I listened to the presets I uninstalled it.

I do like Arturia as a company, they make very good synths and VSTs. I have been getting into the DX7 emulation of theirs, which sounds fantastic.

zeit

Post by zeit » Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:33 am

Downloaded the demo and was impressed. I do not have any wavetable synths so that portion of the synth I love. I love the way this synth sounds. I'm not sure about "cold or sterile sounding", I"m not hearing that but I do love those types of sounds, fwiw....The UI is very clean and accessible. Also, it was a lot lighter on PC resources than other synths I've tried over the last month, that's a big plus for me. I will be adding this synth to my modest collection, no doubt.

User avatar
j_dowe
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: blono, il

Post by j_dowe » Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:48 pm

I'm liking the arp. It has 1-16 steps for Octave, Velocity, Trig Prob, Gate Length, and Slide. Plus randomization %s for each (that can regenerate every X bars), and polyrhythm possibilities (by having different # of steps on parameters, and resyncable).

I imagine there must be other similarly well-designed arps, but from what I've used this excels in flexibility and ease of use.

:yay:

User avatar
grillo
Veteran Wiggler
Posts: 507
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:40 pm
Location: Milan

Post by grillo » Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:57 pm

i took advantage of the basically full free demo and played with pigments over the holidays, but i'm still on the fence.

I like the interface, and there's a lot of scope for doing weird patching with loads of modulation, but i found I can't get patches to sound as good as I can with Serum.

I think Pigments has been somewhat inspired by Serum, but they also expanded on it and arturia has the definitely the edge when it comes to features.

User avatar
Funky40
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 6196
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:08 pm
Location: on a big voyage

Post by Funky40 » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:09 pm

i bought it, i might quasi never use it.....who knows.
what i liked is the GUI,
though, with these given possibilitys it seemed to me that it lacks an envelope or two.


but hey, they need some stuff in the backhand for the V collection 7 or so.......

User avatar
Rex Coil 7
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 7321
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:29 am
Location: Captain Of Outer Space

Post by Rex Coil 7 » Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:32 pm

Funky40 wrote:i bought it, i might quasi never use it.....who knows.
what i liked is the GUI,
though, with these given possibilitys it seemed to me that it lacks an envelope or two.


but hey, they need some stuff in the backhand for the V collection 7 or so.......
"I might quasi never use it" ...... well that's got to be the most non-committal thing I've ever heard someone say! HAAHAA .. :lol:

... "might quasi" .... yea, that there is some "I ain't committing to nuthin!" shit goin' on!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: (good on ya, mate!) :tu: :tu:

Ok, on to business here ...

Is it ok with Ableton, or is Pigments something best left to run stand alone or within the Arturia paradigm? Is it resource needy?

I can't test it because my computer's status is presently a cardboard box full of brand new computer parts that need to be assembled into an operating DAW. I'll be running Win10/Ableton Live 9.7.7 Suite.

:despair:
5U MODULAR NORMALIZING PROJECT (for your entertainment) viewtopic.php?t=78836&highlight=
.. as of Dec 8th 2020 on a break for a bit .. contact me via bamco60@hotmail.com if needed.
WELCOME TO 2021 .. THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES.

User avatar
orangehexagon
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 5:30 pm
Location: CHICAGO

Post by orangehexagon » Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:40 pm

Rex Coil 7 wrote: Is it ok with Ableton, or is Pigments something best left to run stand alone or within the Arturia paradigm? Is it resource needy?
It is quite needy. Ableton's wavetable and other VST's in the Arturia range are much less resource needy than pigments. it sounds great though!

seriously anyone that says it sounds sterile are just weird and/or don't know how to program a synth.

The GUI is vastly superior to those in other Arturia VST's

User avatar
Rex Coil 7
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 7321
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:29 am
Location: Captain Of Outer Space

Post by Rex Coil 7 » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:45 pm

My only use for these wavetable type things is for the cliche ~wub wub~ and vocalesque screaming squelch stuff.

However I've recently learned that those types of VSTs are not required if one owns Ableton and a decent audio interface that is equipped with more than two inputs and two outputs. Audio feedback tricks, and sample mangling are highly effective tools towards the same ends that wavetable VSTs can provide.

That said, I'd rather invest my time/energy into making Ableton and external processors work for me. Otherwise, I'm just going to sound like every other swingin dick that has Pigments (or Serum, or Massive, or .... or ... or ..).

:despair:

I think I'll choose another path ....

[video][/video]

[video][/video]



:domodance: I will eat your brain. :dalek:







:lol:
5U MODULAR NORMALIZING PROJECT (for your entertainment) viewtopic.php?t=78836&highlight=
.. as of Dec 8th 2020 on a break for a bit .. contact me via bamco60@hotmail.com if needed.
WELCOME TO 2021 .. THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES.

User avatar
blipson
Common Wiggler
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:30 pm
Location: 光仔
Contact:

Post by blipson » Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:38 am

I bought Pigments as something that's convenient and fun to jam out to with my The Pipe, and it hasn't disappointed. I would like the groovboxes in Native Instruments Reaktor 6, but NI's damn UI is annoyingly small and non-resizable, and I really don't want to decrease my laptops' resolution because software instruments aren't really my thing. The NI grooveboxes are cool, but not only does the tiny UI make them a pain to tweak, there's also no way to automate repetitiveness out of them. Not a dealbreaker for my purposes, but still a plus for Pigments.

User avatar
Cat-A-Tonic
Lobsters love Muff
Posts: 3764
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan

Re: Pigments

Post by Cat-A-Tonic » Mon May 04, 2020 1:35 am

dig that gooey GUI (and still on sale for a couple more days)

KnobTurner
Learning to Wiggle
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 10:59 pm

Re: Pigments

Post by KnobTurner » Sat May 09, 2020 11:08 pm

j_dowe wrote:
Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:09 pm
[update Jan 4: changed subject to just "Pigments," to discuss the merits of the software in general, and not just the "sound quality"]

Looking for opinions on the sound quality of Pigments...
I find it interesting and useful, not into the factory presets so much but the synth is capable of some usable instruments.

NeuroTom
Learning to Wiggle
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 12:27 pm

Re: Pigments

Post by NeuroTom » Fri May 29, 2020 12:42 am

KnobTurner wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 11:08 pm
j_dowe wrote:
Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:09 pm
[update Jan 4: changed subject to just "Pigments," to discuss the merits of the software in general, and not just the "sound quality"]

Looking for opinions on the sound quality of Pigments...
I find it interesting and useful, not into the factory presets so much but the synth is capable of some usable instruments.
Do you think itÄs worth getting if you already own a copy of Serum?

DrMickeyLauer
Learning to Wiggle
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2020 4:32 pm

Re: Pigments

Post by DrMickeyLauer » Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:07 pm

I really tried to love it, but I don't. I bought it long ago, but find my moving to other synths most of the time. The granular synthesis (since version 2) is the only thing I sometimes use. In general, I find the sound quality dull and lifeless, in particular compared to the products of u-He and Synapse Audio.

User avatar
luketeaford
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2183
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:54 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Pigments

Post by luketeaford » Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:34 pm

I like Pigments a lot-- sounds excellent to me. For people who use modular to build the ideal monosynth, I think pigments is a great expression of that idea (and obviously it's cheap).

What I don't like about it, as with most software synths, is the need to set up a MIDI controller or use a mouse for editing. I think it's fair to say that there are great sounds within Pigments I'll never discover because I don't have a great workflow for playing soft synths.

User avatar
Cat-A-Tonic
Lobsters love Muff
Posts: 3764
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 am
Location: Yokohama, Japan

Re: Pigments

Post by Cat-A-Tonic » Thu Dec 10, 2020 7:44 am

version 2.2 update :)

Post Reply

Return to “Music Software”