Next oscillator.... what's more flexible?

Cwejman, Doepfer, Erica, MakeNoise, Mutable instruments, TipTop Audio, Analogue Solutions, and much more! The world’s most popular format.
Be sure to look into MANUFACTURER SUB-FORA as well..
User avatar
j259
Common Wiggler
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 3:26 pm

Post by j259 »

mattsb wrote:I am in a similar situation, trying to decide between a Rubicon/Dixie combination or an Instruo CsL. All the Rubicon demos seem to be fm sweeps and lots of modulation with little melodic content, whereas threre are a few CsL demos that much more “musical”, so I cannot tell whether I like the oscillator better or the content.

And for the life of me I can’t find a demo of TZFM vs not TZFM other than people demoing what it looks like on the oscilloscope. :sadbanana:
While I tend to use other voices for melodic content, I think the Rubicon has a lot of utility conveniences for melody, such as the octave switching, rock steady tracking, wide octave range, linear FM plus index cv when modulating TZFM, soft sync, sub out, etc.

Can you demo one in person?
User avatar
redonyellow
Common Wiggler
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:54 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by redonyellow »

Can't go wrong with Make Noise DPO. Vactrol strike input is amazing. You can find videos on youtube.

(For my taste preference) Cs-L would be a one-up on the DPO but it is currently supply limited if you can afford to get it.
User avatar
lisa
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 6580
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2017 7:00 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by lisa »

redonyellow wrote:(For my taste preference) Cs-L would be a one-up on the DPO but it is currently supply limited if you can afford to get it.
Cs-L is so much cooler! :) And not more expensive since the op is European. DPO is really expensive over here.
Modular mayhem! And a sweet melody.

User avatar
mattsb
Common Wiggler
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:39 pm
Location: Ottawa

Post by mattsb »

j259 wrote: While I tend to use other voices for melodic content, I think the Rubicon has a lot of utility conveniences for melody, such as the octave switching, rock steady tracking, wide octave range, linear FM plus index cv when modulating TZFM, soft sync, sub out, etc.

Can you demo one in person?
That's the plan. Hopefully Moog Audio in Montreal have one to demo when I drop in the next couple of weeks.

There was a thread on MW 5 years ago where Exper posted a blind comparison between DPO, Rubicon and the Furthurrr (sp?) on Soundcloud for people to compare, and I keep going back to that. Attached is a link to (edited) the playlist

http://soundcloud.com/exper/sets/3-comp ... -osc-tests
'We're not sending astronauts to the moon and back! We're making funny sounds. Let's keep things in perspective here." Dr E&S
User avatar
albiedamned
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1408
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:12 am
Location: Ellicott City, Maryland

Post by albiedamned »

I'll give another plug for FM Aid. It's a small and inexpensive way to get FM and wavefolder sounds using your existing oscillators.

One other option that no one has mentioned in this thread is Modcan FMVDO. Because it's digital, you can can use quantized ratios of modulator to carrier frequency to get pure FM sounds. Or you can turn off the quantization and get crazy FM like on standard complex oscillators.
Stuff I did by myself: https://soundcloud.com/albiedamned21133
Stuff I did with my pretend band: https://soundcloud.com/borisandnatasha
User avatar
nectarios
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 3077
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:44 am

Post by nectarios »

Another vote for FM Aid from me, add a wavefolder and you're in business.
User avatar
albiedamned
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 1408
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:12 am
Location: Ellicott City, Maryland

Post by albiedamned »

nectarios wrote:Another vote for FM Aid from me, add a wavefolder and you're in business.
FM Aid actually sounds quite a bit like a wavefolder on its own, when you use it with just one input.
Stuff I did by myself: https://soundcloud.com/albiedamned21133
Stuff I did with my pretend band: https://soundcloud.com/borisandnatasha
slumberjack

Post by slumberjack »

tpc slim vco makes my rooms shake and has a buchla influence afaik.
medium Rob
Veteran Wiggler
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 2:40 pm

Post by medium Rob »

Plaits is pretty fun.. easy to use and fairly easy to achieve nice, pleasing sounds, with little effort. I have a small system (HEK), with a Rubicon v.1, which is somewhat underused. I do like the clean, accurate, full frequency range of the Rubicon (clean, piercing highs), but I haven't really unlocked its potential (modulation-wise) yet. I don't have room for a wave folder, and I haven't really 'cracked' it with the Wogglebug or Plaits modules (attempting at "complex" modulation) ... I have an opportunity to trade the Rubicon for a Loquelic Iteritas, which is advertised as a "complex oscillator", and it does seem more immediate and immediately characterful, compared to the Rubicon. I'm wondering if I'll regret trading the Rubicon for a Loquelic Iteritas, if the LI might prove to be less flexible and more "one-dimensional" than the Rubicon in the long run. It would free up some space for something like a function generator, which I think could be useful, to 'round out' / increase the capability of my small setup, eventually.

Anybody have any thoughts / opinions on the Loquelic Iteritas that they wouldn't mind sharing? It does seem pretty nasty and aggressive sounding, even a bit extreme, identifiable and capable of some gnarly sounds. Would the LI be a good compliment / contrast / augmentation to Plaits? Is the LI capable of a broad range of timbres, and does it have a large dynamic range (can it be (clean-ish, quiet) / tender / tenuous-sounding / pretty etc.) ? I read some posts about difficulty dialing in clean, upper register/high-pitched sounds. any thoughts, or insights about these modules would be greatly appreciated.
st_corbin
Common Wiggler
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:00 pm
Location: Bow

Post by st_corbin »

medium Rob wrote:Anybody have any thoughts / opinions on the Loquelic Iteritas that they wouldn't mind sharing? It does seem pretty nasty and aggressive sounding, even a bit extreme, identifiable and capable of some gnarly sounds. Would the LI be a good compliment / contrast / augmentation to Plaits? Is the LI capable of a broad range of timbres, and does it have a large dynamic range (can it be (clean-ish, quiet) / tender / tenuous-sounding / pretty etc.) ? I read some posts about difficulty dialing in clean, upper register/high-pitched sounds. any thoughts, or insights about these modules would be greatly appreciated.
I love my LIP. At first I thought it was difficult to tame but I have been able to get some nice higher register leads and such out of it. Sending it through a nice filter or some reverb always helps to smooth things out.
User avatar
SB-SIX
Ultra Wiggler
Posts: 840
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 9:36 am
Location: Nederland
Contact:

Post by SB-SIX »

Here i've tried to explore the softer side of the loquelic. It definitely tends to get harsh quickly, but I've found out that starting with all knobs CCW you can start quite tame in all 3 modes, and dial in chaos to taste.

Loquelic iteritas is the only soundsource, running thru the magneto

https://soundcloud.com/steeboo/the-soft ... lic-iteras

http://soundcloud.com/steeboo/the-softe ... lic-iteras
There is a chance you might like this: https://soundcloud.com/steeboo
User avatar
nectarios
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 3077
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:44 am

Post by nectarios »

Shapeshifter is very flexible. I am selling a v2.02 one, in its own box like new :tu:
User avatar
soon_come
Veteran Wiggler
Posts: 553
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:50 am
Contact:

Post by soon_come »

Klavis Twin Waves. Best digital oscillator(s) I’ve ever used.
User avatar
defalut
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2018 8:26 am
Location: Sweden

Post by defalut »

soon_come wrote:Klavis Twin Waves. Best digital oscillator(s) I’ve ever used.
Cool! I´ve had a few and a TW will arrive here wednesday; really have high hope for it.
User avatar
Todai
Common Wiggler
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 5:16 am
Location: Berlin

Post by Todai »

When I watched the last mylarmelodies podcast he asked DivKid the 'which oscillator would you take to the lonely island' question.

Without hesitation he replied 'something digital, it's so versatile'.


Couldn't agree more. I've had a few and the one that stayed is the E352.

There's also Plaids right underneath and I'd say for a start that would also give you a lot of milage...
User avatar
de_raaf
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 2054
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:44 am
Location: antwerp , Belgium
Contact:

Post by de_raaf »

kind depends what you like, haven't tried all of the stuff especially lot of the new stuff
love the wmd stuff synchrdoyne+expander, pdo with its expanders still kinda underrated
my first vco still love it was the anti osc just has a special sound, have two and still use them a lot
as far as complex buchla 259 inspired) in a package i like the hertz donut mk2, has a special sound or sort of glow to it, mk3 is a bit of a different beast
i guess try some out newer or older, more versatile isn't always better, it depends also great on the amount of control you can have on it via cv or pots and how it feels to tweak and play around with
User avatar
Nino
Wiggling with Experience
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:45 pm

Post by Nino »

The octave switch on the Dixie 2+ is a big plus.
User avatar
dubonaire
Super Deluxe Wiggler
Posts: 10687
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:45 pm

Post by dubonaire »

Nino wrote:The octave switch on the Dixie 2+ is a big plus.
Same on the A-111. Very useful.
User avatar
phineas
Common Wiggler
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:58 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by phineas »

I wonder why nobody recommends the Synth Tech E330. It's a great sounding and very versatile VCO that doesn't cost much.
Probably Plaits has pretty much pushed it out of the spotlight?!
User avatar
magneteyez
Common Wiggler
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:00 pm

Post by magneteyez »

nectarios wrote:Shapeshifter is very flexible.
+1 Flexible and deep
Post Reply

Return to “1U & 3U Eurorack Modules”